Friday, February 13, 2009

Novartis / Fingolimod (FTY720) in the news again...

An interesting article...

MS Drug Prize of $1.3 Billion Spurs Merck KGaA, Novartis Race


By Naomi Kresge


Feb. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Merck KGaA and Novartis AG are racing
to market the first multiple sclerosis pill, a prize that may
generate $1.3 billion a year in sales as patients switch from
injectable drugs.

Merck and Novartis plan to ask regulators this year to
approve tablets to fight the incurable illness. Initial test data
showed that patients who took the drugs had fewer disease flare-
ups than those who received placebo or existing treatments.

A pill may mean an end to painful injections or infusions
that can cost $28,000 a year to control multiple sclerosis, which
can rob people of their mobility and leave them with chronic
aches and depression. Merck, of Darmstadt, Germany, and Novartis,
of Basel, Switzerland, are running ahead of Teva Pharmaceutical
Industries Ltd., Biogen Idec Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis SA in the
chase for an oral treatment. The results may shake up the $6
billion multiple sclerosis market.

“It’s going to be a neck-and-neck race between Merck and
Novartis,” said Markus Mayer, a Munich-based analyst for
UniCredit SpA, after Merck released initial data last month.

The Teva, Biogen and Sanofi pills may not reach patients
before 2012, according to Jack Scannell, an analyst for Sanford
C. Bernstein Ltd. in London. Frost & Sullivan, a research company
based in New York, predicts the market for drugs to treat early
stages of multiple sclerosis may double by 2013.

Merck fell 73 cents, or 1.1 percent, to 67.37 euros in
Frankfurt trading, while Novartis shares climbed 42 centimes, or
1 percent, to 42.51 francs in Zurich.

Cancer Cases

Merck said in January that four patients were diagnosed with
cancer during the late-stage trial of its medicine, known as
cladribine. An independent monitoring board didn’t consider the
cases a safety concern because there were too few to show a
statistical significance, said Phyllis Carter, a Merck
spokeswoman.

Conceived as both a leukemia and multiple sclerosis drug,
cladribine was approved to treat the blood cancer more than 10
years ago and has been used by doctors in injected form to treat
multiple sclerosis in so-called off-label use.

Novartis has also reported two fatal infections and seven
successfully treated cases of skin cancer in patients who took
its candidate, FTY720. Final test results later in the year will
demonstrate how safe each of the medicines is.

If the tablets aren’t linked to such side effects, either
could “revolutionize treatment,” Citigroup analyst Mark Dainty
wrote in a note to clients in January. The products may generate
a total $2.6 billion in revenue in four years’ time, according to
the analyst.

Vulnerable

Merck’s existing drug Rebif, which is injected by the
patient three times a week, had revenue of 1.22 billion euros
($1.57 billion) in 2007. Rebif loses patent protection in 2012,
leaving the German drugmaker vulnerable to generic competition.
Merck reports fourth-quarter results on Feb. 18.

Rebif vies with two other so-called beta interferons, Betaseron by Bayer AG and Biogen’s Avonex, and with a fourth injected therapy, Copaxone from Sanofi and Teva. Interferons generally cut patients’ rate of flare-ups by about 25 to 30 percent, Scannell of Bernstein said. To take over the market, the oral medicines first need to overcome safety concerns.

“Concerns over cancer and opportunistic infection are the
real barriers to what could be substantial first-line use in a
multiple sclerosis market worth around $10 billion a year,”
Scannell said in a note to clients this week.

Infection Risk

Unlike interferons -- genetically produced versions of
natural proteins that suppress the entire immune system --
cladribine and FTY720 affect only certain types of cells, said
Doug Brown, research manager for the Multiple Sclerosis Society
in London who doesn’t have financial ties to either Merck or
Novartis.

The pills work by lowering the amount of immune cells in the body, leaving patients susceptible to infections, Brown said.

Long-term side effects from cladribine are unproven because
leukemia patients took the drug on a shorter-term basis than
multiple sclerosis sufferers would do, he said.

“We don’t see anything in the study that could prevent the drug from being given to patients,” said Bruno Musch, head of global clinical development unit for neurodegenerative diseases for Merck, in an interview before the preliminary results were released last month.

Emma Delahay, 30, a multiple sclerosis patient from
Canterbury, England, who started taking injected Rebif about two
and a half years ago and has since switched to Copaxone, said she
suffered side effects, including skin rashes, while she was
adjusting to the shots.

Disruptive

A pill would end the disruptive after-dinner routine of
organizing syringes, preparing her shots and choosing a new place
to inject herself every day, she said.

“Even though I can inject as part of my daily routine now, it’s still having to prepare myself,” she said. “With taking an oral therapy, it would be a second. With my injection, even though it’s not that long, it’s five or 10 minutes. It’s the preparation time, making sure my injections get stored properly.”

Merck’s study results suggest cladribine and FTY720 could be
as effective as Tysabri, the newest injected multiple sclerosis
drug from Irish drugmaker Elan Corp. and Cambridge,
Massachusetts-based Biogen Idec Inc., according to Scannell.

Tysabri has been plagued by safety concerns, with Biogen and Elan pulling the drug temporarily from the market in February 2005 after two patients died of a rare brain infection, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Five patients taking Tysabri have been diagnosed with the infection since it was reintroduced to the U.S. in 2006. One patient died.

Risk-Benefit

For patients, “it will be a case of weighing up the risk-benefit,” said Brown of the U.K. multiple sclerosis group.

“Doctors and neurologists will be weighing it up as well.”

In tests, cladribine reduced the relapse rate for the disease by more than half compared with patients given a dummy pill in a two-year study, Merck said last month.

The pills, like the injected therapies, work against so-
called relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, the most common
form among the estimated 2.5 million people with the disease,
according to the U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
Symptoms such as loss of vision and numbness flare up and then
subside, and the likelihood of full recovery can sink with each
attack. There is no treatment for rarer forms of the disease in
which patients experience a steady decline.

$1 Billion a Year

Merck, which isn’t affiliated with U.S. drugmaker Merck &
Co., said last fall cladribine could be its next $1 billion-a-
year seller.

In December, Novartis said patients who took its candidate, known generically as fingolimod, had 38 to 52 percent fewer attacks than those on Biogen’s Avonex.

The Novartis pill may surpass $1 billion in annual sales,
Chief Executive Officer Daniel Vasella said on a conference call
with analysts on Jan. 28.

The Swiss company made its first foray into the multiple-sclerosis market this year with Extavia, an injectable interferon identical to Bayer’s Betaseron. Extavia was introduced last month in Germany and Denmark. Extavia will be important for Novartis to gain a foothold in the multiple sclerosis market before it begins selling FTY720, Vasella said.

To contact the reporter on this story:
Naomi Kresge in Zurich at
nkresge@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: February 12, 2009 18:00 EST

7 comments:

TaoWarrior said...

So do we buy stock in Merck or Novartis?

I bet the anylist who said 1.3 million for the first pill doesn't have MS. If the market is 6 millon curently I would say more like 3 million to the first pill.

Ah heck they already got me I might as well get the stock in Novartis.

Jeri Burtchell (TickledPink) said...

I had a talk with my mom a year ago when the final phase II results were released and tried to convince her it was going to be the best thing since sliced bread and that she should buy stock.

As for me, I only had about enough dough to be able to buy 2 shares so I didn't bother. LOL

Lisa Emrich said...

Very interesting article. However, it got a bit tedious with all of the "so-called"s.

I wonder just how many patients really will jump at the switch immediately or take a wait-and-see approach.

Jeri Burtchell (TickledPink) said...

I totally agree, Lisa. Had I not decided to enter the trial, I would probably wait a few years and keep doing tried and true injections.

Especially with the 2 deaths from herpes related viruses and the 7 cases of skin cancer.

Who knows what the longer-term effects might be??

I just happened to have decided to gamble with my life and risk everything to lavish in what turned out (so far) to be great benefits for me... but that doesn't mean I'm not cooking up a big ganglioma or something as I write this.

(OMG I hope that doesn't prove to be prophetic!! KNOCK WOOD! KNOCK WOOD!! A hypochondriac knows better than to every talk like that. What was I thinking??)

TaoWarrior said...

Yeah there will be some wait and see's but I will tell you what when I found out there was research for a pill I scrambled to get in the trial.

After 1 yr of avonex and 6 months of betaseron I was so done with shots. I suspect that those who are used to the shots won't switch right away but new folks will be like me and racing for pills. Also those that are not tolerating shots well will switch. Might also pick up some folks that are not on anything because of a shot phobia.

Anne P said...

After more than ten years on Avonex, with side effects getting progressively worse in years 8 and 9, I was sick and tired of the interferons altogether. I've been hoping for a pill for several years and like others also jumped in to the cage to take my place as a lab rat (beginning next month).

Moles - both benign and pre-cancerous - have been a part of my life forever. Figolimod possibly causing more is just not a problem for me, personally. Finding a dermatologist and getting at least a yearly mole check is as important as paps and mammograms, IMO.

I only wish I had the funds to buy some stock in Novartis...

Suldog said...

Fascinating news. Of course, the best news - the fantastic news - is that so many people have a chance to be helped.